In a report ready for the European Courtroom of Justice (ECJ) in Strasbourg, the advocate normal stated the UK may cease the two-year authorized countdown invoked below Article 50.
The UK had argued that the Article 50 notification may solely be withdrawn with the settlement of all 27 remaining EU member states.
Judges should now determine whether or not to just accept the advocate normal’s recommendation, as they do typically.
In the event that they do, it provides the UK parliament one other manner wherein to power the federal government’s hand. With solely 16 weeks to go earlier than the Article 50 deadline on March 29, choices are operating out if parliament rejects Prime Minister Theresa Could’s Brexit deal.
The case was initially introduced in Scotland by a bunch of anti-Brexit campaigners. Scotland’s prime courtroom, the Courtroom of Session in Edinburgh, had referred it to Strasbourg for a ruling. The case was fiercely opposed by the British authorities, which unsuccessfully argued that the Supreme Courtroom in London ought to intervene earlier than the case went to Europe.
Jolyon Maugham, one of many petitioners within the case, welcomed the advocate normal’s opinion, urging UK lawmakers to “search their consciences and act in the most effective pursuits of the nation.”
“The choice is one which the UK could make unilaterally — with no need the consent of the opposite Member States. That places the choice about our future again into the fingers of our personal elected representatives — the place it belongs,” he wrote on Twitter.
MPs will spend the following 5 days debating the deal earlier than a vote subsequent Tuesday, which Could is broadly anticipated to lose.
Earlier than Tuesday’s debate begins, Could may face one other setback, when MPs vote on whether or not her authorities ought to be held in contempt of parliament for failing to publish the total authorized recommendation on her deal.