Stone, a longtime affiliate of President Donald Trump and political determine, agreed with the sentiment in a Friday evening interview on CNN’s “Cuomo Prime Time.”
“I feel I in all probability am the individual referred to,” Stone mentioned Friday night.
Earlier Friday, Stone acknowledged to CNN that an change within the indictment matches messages he beforehand launched, however initially maintained that he didn’t consider that he’s the unnamed individual within the indictment. Stone mentioned the messages “do not present any proof of collaboration or collusion.”
The indictment states that on August 15, 2016, and once more on September 9, Russian officers posing as Guccifer 2.0 “wrote an individual who was in common contact with senior members” of the Trump marketing campaign, with language that matches Twitter messages beforehand launched by Stone, who shouldn’t be named within the indictment.
Stone advised CNN by telephone, “I do not assume it’s me as a result of I wasn’t in common contact with members of the Trump marketing campaign,” though he was in touch with Donald Trump himself.
Referring to remarks from Deputy Legal professional Normal Rod Rosenstein on Friday, Stone mentioned, “Look, Rosenstein mentioned in his feedback that they knew of no crime by US residents. They included my change with Guccifer, which is now public, within the indictment. And it is benign. So I do not know that it refers to me.”
He added, “Based mostly on timing, content material and context, they’re benign. They definitely do not present any proof of collaboration or collusion.”
Stone went on to carefully parse the language of the indictment, arguing, “My contact with the marketing campaign in 2016 was Donald Trump. I used to be not in common contact with marketing campaign officers.”
In his interview later Friday with Cuomo, Stone that he “misunderstood the reference.”
“I by no means denied that it was me, I simply did not perceive the sooner reference,” Stone advised CNN’s Chris Cuomo.
Sam Nunberg, Stone’s former protégé, mentioned in an interview on CNN’s “Erin Burnett OutFront” that he additionally thought the indictment was referring to Stone.
“I feel that they are referencing Roger,” Nunberg mentioned Friday night.
“After I communicated with Roger about this, Roger advised me he had met with Assange and I believed him on the time. I requested him if Assange had data on Benghazi. … Roger mentioned no, it was going to be details about the Clinton Basis. I by no means spoke to him about Guccifer,” he mentioned.
Nunberg added that he thought Stone is “a crucial piece for Bob Mueller.”
“He is spending some huge cash, and Roger is a crucial piece for him to make the argument for an impeachment of Donald Trump,” Nunberg advised CNN’s Erin Burnett.
In a information convention Friday, Rosenstein mentioned the indictment doesn’t title an American citizen as a figuring out participant.”
“There is no such thing as a allegation within the indictment that any American was a figuring out participant within the alleged illegal exercise or knew they had been speaking with Russian intelligence officers,” Rosenstein mentioned, stressing that the investigation was “ongoing.”
In his Friday evening interview, Stone continued to say he doesn’t consider Russia behind the hacking of the 2016 election.
“No, I am sorry, I feel it’s nonetheless unproven,” Stone advised Cuomo.
Moreover, the indictment alleges that “group 1” launched greater than “20,000 emails and different paperwork stolen from the DNC community by the Conspirators” on or about July 22, 2016, simply earlier than the beginning of the Democratic Nationwide Conference. Although not named within the indictment, the group seems to be WikiLeaks, which launched 1000’s of DNC emails on July 22, 2016. The indictment additionally alleges that group 1 launched the primary set off emails from the chairman of the Clinton marketing campaign on October 7, 2016, which is similar day WikiLeaks launched the primary batch of John Podesta’s emails.
The indictment lays out how the Russian intelligence officers, posing as Guccifer 2.0, mentioned tips on how to launch the stolen paperwork to “heighten their affect” on the election with group 1 offering steerage on timing.
The indictment additional alleges the hackers’ particularly sought out paperwork from the Democratic Congressional Marketing campaign Committee associated to Hillary Clinton, Ted Cruz, Trump and the Benghazi investigations.
It additionally alleges a congressional candidate requested Guccifer 2.Zero for stolen paperwork, which the candidate then obtained.
Grant Smith, an legal professional for Stone, mentioned in a press release, “It’s clear from the indictment issued at the moment that our shopper, Roger Stone, was not in any approach concerned with any of the alleged hacking of the 2016 election.”
“As he testified earlier than the Home Intelligence Committee beneath oath, his 24 phrase change with somebody on Twitter claiming to be Guccifer 2.Zero is benign primarily based on its content material, context and timing. This change is now completely public and offers no proof of collaboration or collusion with Guccifer 2.Zero or anybody else within the alleged hacking of the DNC emails. Roger obtained no data from Guccifer 2.Zero or dcLeaks, nor did he present any counsel to them. As was firmly established within the lately dismissed lawsuit and within the indictment at the moment, Roger’s benign communications first happen many weeks after the alleged hacking occasions described in at the moment’s indictment.”
DCLeaks is one other pseudonym utilized by Russian intelligence officers to launch damaging data on Clinton’s marketing campaign and Democrats in Washington, in response to the indictment.
Particular counsel Robert Muller’s workplace declined to remark Friday. The US congressional candidate who requested for stolen paperwork and the one who communicated with the conspirators and with the Trump marketing campaign weren’t charged within the indictment.
CNN’s Sophie Tatum contributed to this report.